How to Use Auto ISO for Wildlife Photography

Ruby-throated hummingbird, Thickwood Hills, Saskatchewan
Ruby-throated hummingbird, Thickwood Hills, Saskatchewan
Ruby-throated hummingbird, Thickwood Hills, Saskatchewan. Nikon D850, Sigma 150-600 f5-6.3 lens. 1/800 sec. f6.3, ISO 320.

We have become increasingly reliant on the “Manual Mode + Auto ISO” method for photographing wildlife, especially for flying birds or for other situations where the action happens quickly, or when the subject is moving among different light conditions.

Great blue heron, Saskatchewan
Great blue heron, Big Quill Lake, Saskatchewan. Nikon D850, Sigma 150-600 f, ISO 2500. The sun was setting and the light fading fast. A shutter speed of 1/800 was enough to get an acceptably sharp image, but it required a high ISO of 2500. The image had a fair amount of noise because of the high ISO but it was possible to decrease the noise during processing.

In any type of photography, the more control we have over the camera, the better chances we have of getting the shot we want. For most cameras, these are typically the range of options we have to maintain control:

Manual Mode

This gives us maximum control. We decide on the most appropriate shutter speed, aperture setting (or f-stop), and the ISO setting. The downside with a completely manual approach is that by the time we fiddle with all the settings, the critter we’re trying to photograph may be long gone.

Canvasback ducks
Male and female canvasback ducks during spring mating season. Nikon D850, Sigma 150-600 f5-6.3 lens. 1/1000 sec. f6.3, ISO 400.

Auto or Program Mode

In Auto the camera makes all the setting decisions, and in Program Mode we may have some control but most decisions are still made by the camera. This is great from an action standpoint – you concentrate on focus and composition while the camera automatically alters settings according to light conditions as a bird flies around, for example. The downside is that we lose artistic control. The camera may do fine in making technical decisions to get a properly exposed image, but it doesn’t know what your artistic vision is for the shot. It doesn’t know, for example, if you want a fast shutter speed to stop the wings on a flying bird or if you want a bit of blur in the wings to give a sense of movement. It doesn’t know if you want a shallow depth of field so that a deer stands out from the background or a wider depth of field to capture a group of deer standing together.

Chipping sparrow, Saskatchewan
Chipping sparrow. Nikon D850, Sigma 150-600 f5-6.3 lens, 1/800 Sec. f6.3, ISO 640.

Shutter Priority

For this mode, we set the shutter speed and ISO, then let the camera adjust the aperture to suit light conditions. At first glance this seems to make sense because we can be assured of a fast enough shutter speed for action shots. However, for most wildlife shots we also want a shallow depth of field so that the subject stands out from the background. For example, let’s say that you’re photographing a bird in the shade of the forest. Shutter priority may work fine here because the camera will likely have to open the aperture quite wide to let in enough light. But if that bird suddenly flies out of the shade and lands on a branch in bright sunlight, the camera will have to close the aperture significantly. This will result in a wider depth of field, with less or no separation between the bird and the trees in the background.

Merlin in flight, Saskatchewan
Merlin in flight. Nikon D850, Sigma 150-600mm f5-6.3 lens. 1/2000 sec. f6.3, ISO 100.

Aperture Priority

Here we lock in the aperture setting and the ISO, and let the camera automatically alter the shutter speed according to light conditions. This has long been the go-to mode for many wildlife photographers. In most (though not all) cases, we want a shallow depth of field so that our subject is in focus but the background becomes blurry, making the subject stand out. To achieve this we set the aperture to its widest or near widest opening. Since the aperture is wide and letting in a lot of light, the camera has to speed up the shutter (letting in less light) to compensate for this.

Red-winged blackbird, Saskatchewan
Red-winged blackbird. Nikon D850, Nikon 600mm f4 lens. 1/1600 sec, f4, ISO 400.

This usually results in the best of both worlds, since we also need a fast shutter speed to stop the action for birds in flight or when an animal is moving around a lot. A downside is that the camera is constrained by whatever ISO we chose. We can certainly change the ISO, but can we do it quickly enough when the action is fast and furious?

Bufflehead ducks, Saskatchewan
Two male bufflehead ducks competing to attract a female. Nikon D850, Nikon 600 f4 lens. 1/3200 sec. f5.6, ISO 900. Because of the action I chose a fast shutter speed of 1/3200 sec. Since there were two birds, I chose f5.6 instead of leaving it wide open at f4 in order to give slightly more depth of field in case both birds were not on the same plane. This resulted in an ISO of 900 which was still low enough to give a reasonably clean image.

Manual Mode + Auto ISO

To get a proper exposure, we have three variables to work with – aperture opening, shutter speed and ISO – often referred to as the exposure triangle. Change one, and at least one of the others has to change to compensate. In this method, we keep complete control of the two variables that provide us with the most artistic choices – aperture and shutter speed – by using manual mode. But unlike a fully manual mode where we have to continually fiddle with settings to compensate for changing light conditions, here we use Auto ISO, so that the camera automatically changes the ISO according to changing light conditions. Part of the theory here is that ISO is the least creative part of the exposure triangle, so that’s why we leave that part of the decision-making to the camera.

American Goldfinch, Saskatchewan
Goldfinch taking flight. Nikon D850, Nikon 600mm f4 lens. 1/1600 sec. f4, ISO 400. 1/1600 was enough to stop the action, while f4 provided a shallow depth of field so that the bird stood out from the branches immediately behind it.

In most situations, we want a fairly wide aperture setting to provide separation between the subject and background with a shallow depth of field. Where to set the shutter speed depends on the light and other conditions. We find this method most useful for photographing flying birds, where we know that a fast shutter speed will be essential. Depending on the light, a good starting point for action is between a 1/800 and 1/4000 shutter speed. The faster the speed, the better chance of getting a sharp image. On a sunny day, even a fairly fast shutter speed will result in the camera using a fairly low ISO. If the bird suddenly flies into the shade, or a cloud comes by, the camera will compensate by increasing the ISO, while leaving you free to shoot at a fast shutter speed.

Red-tailed hawk in flight, Saskatchewan
Red-tailed hawk in flight. Nikon D850 Nikon 600mm f4 lens. 1/4000 sec. f4, ISO 400. Because the bird was flying, I chose a very fast shutter speed of 1/4000 sec. Since it was a bright sunny day, the ISO was only 400 which made for a clean photo with no noise.

Of course there are some downsides to this as well. A fast shutter speed in darker conditions may result in a fairly high ISO, and as a consequence could have lots of noise (or graininess) in the image. How high is too high for ISO will depend on the camera. Many modern cameras can go well over 1000 ISO and still get acceptable images, while in some cameras the noise can get quite bad after 400 or 640 ISO. You can test your camera by a taking a series of shots at different ISO settings and determining at what point the noise becomes so bad that the image is no longer acceptable.

Sandhill cranes, Saskatchewan
Sandhill cranes during fall migration. Nikon D850, Nikon 600 f4 lens. 1/2000 sec. f5, ISO 250.

The way we look at it is that if we have to choose between an image with some noise because the ISO was high, and an image that is blurry because the shutter speed wasn’t fast enough, noise is certainly the lesser of evils. Various processing programs allow you to decrease a lot of the noise. On the other hand, there is no saving a blurry photo.

The other benefit of this method is that for most cameras the shutter speed is fairly quick to change. On our Nikon cameras, for example, the shutter is controlled by a wheel right behind the shutter button, so a quick turn of the wheel with the thumb can increase or decrease the shutter speed without looking away from the viewfinder. In the case of the bird flying between bright sun and a dark setting, it’s quicker to turn the wheel to increase the shutter speed (and consequently get a lower ISO) than it is to change the ISO in one of the other shooting modes.

Male bufflehead duck coming in for a landing. Nikon D850, Nikon 600mm f4 lens. 1/2000 sec. f5, ISO 250.

No one shooting method is perfect for all conditions, but we’ve managed to get more “keepers” by using the Manual Mode + Auto ISO option when photographing flying birds and other active wildlife.

SUBSCRIBE to Photojourneys below

Feel free to PIN this article

PIN for Auto ISO settings

3 thoughts on “How to Use Auto ISO for Wildlife Photography

  1. Dear Robin and Arlene,
    I enjoyed reading it and I appreciate your honesty and willingness to share all your settings.
    I learned a lot.

  2. I get a lot of noise & under exposed images when I use auto iso for birds in flight against a blue sky on a well lit day. The images come out almost pixelated and dark despite the auto iso. I am typically shooting as fast as my lens can go 6.3 with 1/2000 shutter speeds on large raptors, image stabilization on and from a tripod. I understand with center metering the camera should adjust for the subject relative to the amount of background better but still can’t figure out why with auto ISO i am still under exposing..

  3. Hi Joseph. The most likely cause for getting under-exposed images for birds in flight against the sky is that the camera is evaluating the entire frame and tries to come up with an average exposure for the entire scene. Large raptors are generally fairly dark. When you photograph them against a bright sky, the bird usually takes up a smaller part of the frame than does the sky (unless you are able to get a frame-filling shot of the bird). So the camera gets fooled into thinking that the image is too bright and compensates by letting in less light, resulting in an under-exposed bird. I see that you have already tried centre-weighted metering which should help somewhat. If you find that this issue is occurring consistently, the easiest solution would be to add some exposure compensation. How much will depend on how dark the photos are. A good place to start might be add a full stop of exposure compensation and adjust the amount from there. Whenever a high ISO is used, noise is usually inevitable. The best we can do in such cases is to use noise-reducing software.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *